Re: SGML tools aren't so great

[Jorge Godoy <godoy@conectiva.com.br>]

"der.hans" <ldp-discuss@LuftHans.com> writes:

> > I'll repeat...excellent environment to work in, but not cheap.
> 
> If they work, then we need to have that listed on the H-H. Frame is
> available where I was working (Motorola) and I could've gotten at least
> one copy of Frame+SGML "for evaluation purposes" if I'd've wanted to :).
> 
> If we can get WP and other word processors to spit out good docbook,
> cool. I won't be using them :), but no reason for others to not do
> so. What satanic incantations they have to make is mostly irrelevant as
> long as they provide proper sgml. It's their souls at stake, not mine :).

I'd like to say that although they produce SGML output, one should be
very careful on using them. Always take a look at it's output and see
if nothing can be improved. 

It would be nice if we could have one of these to try with Greg's
scripts... 


Regards, 
-- 
Godoy.	<godoy@conectiva.com> 

Departamento de Publicações
Publishing Department                   Conectiva S.A.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org